From the left: Dr. Zoltán Lomnici, Frank Koszorus, Héjj Tibor, Forum host (Jules) Gyula Balogh,
and André Goodfriend US Embassy Charge d'Affairs.
The Budapest FORUM
to improve US-Hungary relations 11/26/2014.
The FORUM was
sponsored by the American Hungarian Federation,
and held under
the auspices of its sister foundation in
Hungary
the Amerikaiak a Magyarokért Alapítvány (www.AMKL.org).
The Forum was the first of a series to be held to restore
the excellent relations that the United States had with Hungary for many years,
but which had been deteriorating since the leftist government, which the U.S.
government favored, was ousted in 2010. This first of a kind FORUM brought
together parties that have differing views on the political landscape of
Hungary and bilateral relations between
the two natural allies. The purpose of
the Forum was to candidly exchange ideas and come to an understanding of these
various perspectives.
The participants included
the U.S. Charge d' Affaires André
Goodfriend, Dr. Lomnici Zoltán, Jr.,
the spokesperson of the Civil Összefogás Forum ( CÖF), American Hungarian
Federation President Frank Koszorus, Jr., Mr. Héjj Tibor President of Proactive
Management Consulting, and Mr. (Jules) Gyula Balogh President of the Amerikaiak
a Magyarokért Alapítvány. All of the
participants had experience working or being educated in the United States.
The FORUM followed a very moving Thanksgiving celebration
where Americans, Hungarians and American Hungarians gave thanks for what they
had received over the past year and shared the
wonderful feelings they had for America.
The FORUM started with observations by the participants
of what was good about America and Hungary, as viewed by both sides. America was noted for its
acceptance of foreigners and the rule of law by the Hungarians, and Hungary was
noted for its friendliness to foreigners and its fights for freedom and
democracy. Dr. Lomnici described his wonderful 6 years in the U.S.
at the NIH where he had a grant to study issues relating to tobacco. Mr.
Hejj described his obtaining his MBA in
the U.S. where he went with his family and 4 children. He experienced the
hospitality of the people and friendships with professors, the educational
system, the honesty of the students, even the wonderful nursery for his
children. He also talked about how friendly and accepting the students were to
a youth who was disabled. Mr. Koszorus spoke about the freedoms and
opportunities provided to all in the U.S. to succeed, and the tremendous
benefits citizenship provides. Mr. Balogh spoke about coming to the U.S. at age
7 and how his mother said that you must always keep your Hungarian heart, but
you are now an American. He mentioned
the good things about the U.S. are the friendliness of the people and the
willingness to help other people and the entrepreneurial spirit of the past. He
also said that Hungary is a magical land, like Disneyworld, charming with
wonderful people and a beautiful countryside.
Mr. Goodfriend said that the U.S. and Hungary had many things in common. The U.S. has accepted people
from diverse lands and that acceptance
is one of the great strengths of America. Hungary in the past has also been
very accepting of other peoples.
The FORUM then moved to a discussion of the concerns that Hungarians and American Hungarians had
with the U.S. government’s approach to Hungary and the issues the U.S.
government had with Hungary. Mr. Koszorus,
who also represented the Federation at the Hungarian Diaspora Committee meeting
earlier that week, read a moving letter from an apolitical professor in
Hungary who is a friend of the United
States but who reiterated the perception that the U.S. was demeaning and
humiliating the Hungarian people with its overwhelming and public criticism,
much of which was overstated or lacked proof.
Dr. Lomnici said
he did not want to ruin the wonderful Thanksgiving atmosphere, so he politely
described some of the problems in the U.S., such as discrimination against
blacks and corruption, implying that
the U.S. may not have much standing to
criticize others. He also mentioned that the U.S. did not help Hungary in 1956
and that was a sore point among Hungarians.
Mr. Héjj, among
other things, mentioned that Hungary has been historically surrounded by
conflict from other countries and that Hungarians often have had to fend for
themselves, such as in 1956. They
therefore are very sensitive
about their sovereignty. He said that Americans need to understand this when
they involve themselves in the internal workings of Hungary.
Mr. Balogh put forth the question of why the U.S. only
criticizes conservative governments. Mr. Goodfriend had many good things to say
about Hungary, such as that the people are friendly and that it is a democracy. He also indicated that he had an issue with the formulation of the latter
question, since he felt that the U.S. approach was not criticism of one party
but a dialogue about what the embassy observed in Hungary.
The final question asked how to solve the issues between
the two countries. There was agreement that enhanced exchange programs
highlighting both cultures, student exchange programs, cooperation in research,
improved trade, taking sensitive
discussions behind closed doors, and both governments being proactive on
improving relations would go a long way to removing the strain between the U.S.
and Hungary.